Skip to content

Starbucks Effectively Stole A Coffee Lip Balm Product From A Smaller Company

Starbucks responded via email, saying it "firmly believes[s] these accusations are without substance, and we look forward to presenting our position in court."

A Los Angeles-based firm named Balmuccino alleged (again) in a lawsuit filed last week that the coffee giant stole its ideas and sources for a coffee lip balm product. Starbucks responded via email, saying it "firmly believes[s] these accusations are without substance, and we look forward to presenting our position in court." This is the company's second suit attempt. According to Reuters, the first action was filed in 2019, but it was dismissed because the court determined that it "lacked jurisdiction," or lacked the ability to hear the matter.

According to Balmuccino's lawsuit, Starbucks "essentially stole" the lip balm idea when Balmuccino met with Mesh Gelman, the company's head of product development and an SVP at the time. According to the lawsuit, Gelman requested a lot of information on the device and stated that he would "run the idea 'up the flagpole.'" Balmuccino was to be "duly paid and given appropriate credit" for the invention. The firm then says that in 2018, a supplier for the lip balm informed Balmuccino that it had received contact from Starbucks for a product with "similar" specifications to those offered to Gelman by Balmuccino. According to the suit, Starbucks introduced a line of lip balms based on the S'mores Frappuccino in April 2019.

According to the claim, the initial meeting came about because one of Balmuccino's workers, Samantha Lemole, "was" a sister-in-law of Dr. Oz, who subsequently linked her with Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz (who is currently transitioning out of the role). According to Balmuccino, during the initial meeting with Gelman, they asked the executives to sign an NDA, but Gelman declined, stating that "the meeting and the items discussed therein were completely confidential, and that the relationship between Mr. Schultz and Dr. Oz, who had brokered the meeting, should provide the necessary comfort and protections Plaintiff was seeking via the Non-Disclosure Agreement."

As a result, the action contends that the corporation breached its verbal commitment to respect an NDA. According to IMDB entries, Lemole filed for divorce from George Griffith, who is connected to Dr. Oz, in December 2020. However, according to her website profile, she is still married to Griffith and considers Dr. Oz to be her "brother-in-law." The damages in Balmuccino's action were not specified.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT